Responses to generative AI
Widespread debates about the future of artificial intelligence and the need for ethical frameworks and regulatory policies to mitigate potential harms, re-ignited in 2022 by OpenAI’s first release of generative artificial intelligence (AI)…
Listado en Report | publicación de grupo Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE)
Versión 1.0 - publicado en 13 Jan 2025 doi: 10.25547/KF0B-JQ49 - cite this
Licencia Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0
Descripción
Widespread debates about the future of artificial intelligence and the need for ethical frameworks and regulatory policies to mitigate potential harms, re-ignited in 2022 by OpenAI’s first release of generative artificial intelligence (AI) system ChatGPT, continue to receive attention by scholars and media alike. Generative artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft’s Bing (both powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4) and Google’s Gemini (Bard, previously) can be used to generate poetry, essays, code, translations, and exam responses, as well as images and videos.
Cita este trabajo
Los investigadores deben citar este trabajo de la siguiente manera:
- Amell, B., (2025), "Responses to generative AI", HSSCommons: (DOI: 10.25547/KF0B-JQ49)
Etiquetas
Notas
Original publication: Amell, Brittany. "Responses to generative AI." Open Scholarship Policy Observatory, 14 Nov. 2024, https://ospolicyobservatory.uvic.ca/responses-to-generative-ai/.
This material has been re-published in an unmodified form on the Canadian HSS Commons with the permission of the Open Scholarship Policy Observatory. All materials are published under a Creative Commons ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED). The full license description can be found on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
Vista previa de la publicación
Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE)
This publication belongs to the Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE) group.
When watching a publication, you will be notified when a new version is released.