Integrating outside sources for rhetorical purposes is an essential element of academic writing; yetdoing so effectivelycan be problematic for academic writers. While corpus-based research into science writing has provided valuable insights into how published authors work with sources, citation practices in the humanities have remained largely unexplored. This paper analyzes citation conventions in a 35-article literary studies corpus and contextualizes its findings within previous research, thereby revealing distinctive writing practices in the field. Important findings include that literary studies authors cite relatively less and favor quotation over paraphrase and summary, unlike writers in previously-examined fields. As well, their syntactic integration of references and reporting verbs substantially differ. This research problematizes generalizations about humanities writing and questions assumptions regarding whether extensive commonalities exist between humanities and social science writing. The results provide further support for discipline-specific writing instruction and underline the need for further research into humanities writing practices.

Los investigadores deben citar este trabajo de la siguiente manera:

• Grav, P. F., (2025), "Harnessing Sources in the Humanities: A Corpus-based Investigation of Citation Practices in English Literary Studies", HSSCommons: (DOI: 10.31468/cjsdwr.728)

  Copy Citation | Export metadata as... | JSON | CSV | RO-Crate | BibTex | EndNote

1. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie

Original publication: Grav, Peter F. "Harnessing Sources in the Humanities: A Corpus-based Investigation of Citation Practices in English Literary Studies." Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, vol. 29, 2019, pp. 24-50. DOI: 10.31468/cjsdwr.728. This material has been re-published in an unmodified form on the Canadian HSS Commons with the permission of Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie. Copyright © the author(s). Work published in DW/R is licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-SA license