Review, promotion, and tenure guidelines have been criticized by some as impediments to a transition to open scholarship (see The Film Paywall: The Business of Scholarship and Partner Response to Tri-Agency Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management). The Review, Promotion, and Tenure (RPT) Project analyzes RPT documents from universities in the US and Canada in order to determine how publishing in Open Access (OA) and closed-access venues are incentivized and how this incentivization affects open scholarship.

Pesquisadores devem citar este trabalho da seguinte forma:

• Winter, C., (2024), "The Review, Promotion, and Tenure Project at the ScholCommLab", HSSCommons: (DOI: 10.25547/Z928-1002)

  Copy Citation | Export metadata as... | JSON | CSV | RO-Crate | BibTex | EndNote

1. open scholarship
2. open scholarship policy observatory
3. policy analysis

Original publication: Winter, Caroline. "The Review, Promotion, and Tenure Project at the ScholCommLab." Open Scholarship Policy Observatory, 27 Sep. 2019, https://ospolicyobservatory.uvic.ca/the-review-promotion-and-tenure-project-at-the-scholcommlab/.

This material has been re-published in an unmodified form on the Canadian HSS Commons with the permission of the Open Scholarship Policy Observatory. All materials are published under a Creative Commons ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED). The full license description can be found on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.