Book 6 of the De aspectibus takes on a dual significance as an end to Alhacen’s reflection-analysis, not simply because it concludes that analysis but because it represents the ultimate goal for it. Accordingly, Alhacen’s purpose is to apply the cathetus-rule to an analysis of the various misperceptions that arise in the seven types of mirrors chosen for study in the previous books. Some of these misperceptions are common to all mirrors, an example being image-displacement.  Some, however, are specific to the shape of the mirror, concave mirrors being a major source because of magnification, image-inversion, and image-location.

Los investigadores deben citar este trabajo de la siguiente manera:

• A. Mark Smith, (2023), "Alhacen on Image-Formation and Distortion in Mirrors: A Critical Edition, with English Translation and Commentary, of Book 6 of Alhacen’s De aspectibus", HSSCommons: (DOI: 10.25547/T3MK-M162)

  Copy Citation | Export metadata as... | JSON | CSV | RO-Crate | BibTex | EndNote

1. interpretatio
2. reflection-analysis

Original publication: Smith, A. Mark. Alhacen on Image-Formation and Distortion in Mirrors: A Critical Edition, with English Translation and Commentary, of Book 6 of Alhacen’s De aspectibus. Interpretatio Series B. 2020. URI: https://ircps.org/interpretatio-b/b005/. This material has been re-published in an unmodified form on the Canadian HSS Commons with the permission of Iter Canada. Copyright © the author(s). Their work is distributed by Interpretatio under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. For details, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/.