What imaginings of the doctoral writer circulate in the talk of doctoral researchers and their supervisors? How do institutional policies and the conventions of particular disciplines shape the ways in which doctoral writing is imagined? Why, and in what ways, has doctoral writing been re-imagined in the twenty-first century? What future imaginings of doctoral writing may be hovering on the horizon? This edited collection has gathered a diverse group of authors—from Aotearoa New Zealand, Australia, Bangladesh, Japan, South Africa, the UK, Denmark, Canada, and the US—to consider these challenging questions during a time in which doctoral education is undergoing enormous transformation. Together, the contributors to this collection explore how the practice of doctoral writing is entangled with broader concerns within doctoral education, including attrition, timeliness, the quality of supervision, the transferability of knowledge and skills to industry settings, research impact, research integrity, and the decolonization of the doctorate.

Pesquisadores devem citar este trabalho da seguinte forma:

• Badenhorst, C., Amell, B., Burford, J., (2024), "Re-imagining Doctoral Writing", HSSCommons: (DOI: 10.37514/int-b.2021.1343)

  Copy Citation | Export metadata as... | JSON | CSV | RO-Crate | BibTex | EndNote

1. dissertation writing
2. doctoral education
3. doctoral supervision
4. doctoral writing
5. graduate studies
6. graduate supervision
7. graduate writing
8. writing and rhetoric

Original publication source: The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado (http://dx.doi.org/10.37514/int-b.2021.1343)

Citation: Badenhorst, C., Amell, B., & Burford, J. (Eds.). (2021). Re-imagining Doctoral Writing. The WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.37514/INT-B.2021.1343