Responses to generative AI

Widespread debates about the future of artificial intelligence and the need for ethical frameworks and regulatory policies to mitigate potential harms, re-ignited in 2022 by OpenAI’s first release of generative artificial intelligence (AI)…

Listed in Report | publication by group Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE)

Preview publication

Version 1.0 - published on 13 Jan 2025 doi: 10.25547/KF0B-JQ49 - cite this

Licensed under Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

2 total view(s), 6 download(s)

Description

Widespread debates about the future of artificial intelligence and the need for ethical frameworks and regulatory policies to mitigate potential harms, re-ignited in 2022 by OpenAI’s first release of generative artificial intelligence (AI) system ChatGPT, continue to receive attention by scholars and media alike. Generative artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT and Microsoft’s Bing (both powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4) and Google’s Gemini (Bard, previously) can be used to generate poetry, essays, code, translations, and exam responses, as well as images and videos.

Tags

  1. credibility
  2. generative AI
  3. open access
  4. open scholarship
  5. trust

Notes

Original publication: Amell, Brittany. "Responses to generative AI." Open Scholarship Policy Observatory, 14 Nov. 2024, https://ospolicyobservatory.uvic.ca/responses-to-generative-ai/.

This material has been re-published in an unmodified form on the Canadian HSS Commons with the permission of the Open Scholarship Policy Observatory. All materials are published under a Creative Commons ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED). The full license description can be found on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

 

Publication preview

Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE)

Implementing New Knowledge Environments (INKE) group image

When watching a publication, you will be notified when a new version is released.