GitHub as Scholarly Communication: A community-sourced starter guide

By Brittany Amell1, Jamie Takaoka2

1. University of Victoria 2. Carleton University

In May of 2022, Britt asked Twitter for help finding sources to make the argument that sharing code via repositories like GitHub could be considered a form of Scholarly Communications. (This was when Twitter was Twitter.) Her tweet generated a lot…

Listed in Online resource

Preview publication

Version 1.0 - published on 31 Mar 2025

Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0

0 questions (Ask a question)

0 review(s) (Review this)

20 total view(s), 19 download(s)

Usage

Views

9

11 9

The above numbers reflect non-unique views of the page, which may include multiple views in the same day by the same user.

Downloads

4

15 4

The above numbers reflect non-unique user access to the linked content, which includes but is not limited to primary access button clicks, bundle downloads, and supporting documents.

When watching a publication, you will be notified when a new version is released.