The position of Chief Minister established by Cardinal Richelieu conjoined the minister’s role with the exercise of power. Since all final decisions remained with the king, this system of government was claimed as legitimate. Nevertheless, there were opponents of Richelieu’s ministry. The devout faction, represented by Mathieu de Morgues et Michel de Marillac, saw the new institution as a change to the current theory of monarchy, and thus open to legal challenge. On that basis, they laid out their opposition with a set of arguments. This essay analyzes the arguments, against Richelieu ’s ministry, that refer to the principles of monarchy.

Researchers should cite this work as follows:

• Maillet-Rao, C., (2025), "La théologie politique des dévots Mathieu de Morgues et Michel de Marillac, opposants au cardinal de Richelieu", HSSCommons: (DOI: )

  Copy Citation | Export metadata as... | JSON | CSV | RO-Crate | BibTex | EndNote

1. Renaissance and Reformation

Original publication: Maillet-Rao, Caroline. "La théologie politique des dévots Mathieu de Morgues et Michel de Marillac, opposants au cardinal de Richelieu." Renaissance and Reformation 32 (3): 2010. 51-77. DOI: 10.33137/rr.v32i3.13986. This material has been re-published in an unmodified form on the Canadian HSS Commons with the permission of Iter Canada / Renaissance and Reformation. Copyright © the author(s). Their work is distributed by Renaissance and Reformation under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. For details, see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/.